The Useless One
curepimmy:

discwars:

discwars:

discwars:

what the fuck is this bullshit


HES STILL THERE


THAT ONES NOT EVEN RED 

This reminds me of the time I was having trouble drawing fists, like

No shit I mean like on a PERSON

curepimmy:

discwars:

discwars:

discwars:

what the fuck is this bullshit

HES STILL THERE

THAT ONES NOT EVEN RED 

This reminds me of the time I was having trouble drawing fists, like

No shit I mean like on a PERSON

canadican:

rider-waite:

lauramain-sherlolly:

dudeufugly:

wivalamine:

shahlalalalala:

earthlyscum:

can someone bring capes back into fashion

when the fuck did they even go out of fashion

Why the fuck did they even go out of fashion

image

image

image

image

image

image

The first time the Incredibles took over a post and I am so happy about it

reminder that stratogale was in high school when she got sucked into the airplane propeller and died

do you ever just think edna sat in the back of the funeral in the little hometown church
the sound of sniffling and crying surrounding her
wearing a floor-length black dress and a black veil to hide her puffy eyes as she takes out her sketchbook and starts ripping all her design ideas for costumes out
whispering “no capes. no capes. no capes.” over and over, knowing that it was her fault a high school student died a horrific, painful death to the point where they can’t have a body to bury

WHAT

WHY WOULD YOU

WHY WOULD YOU

WHY

I like that idea. Gonna make that my head-canon. Builds character for Edna.

givemeinternet:

I love this post.

givemeinternet:

I love this post.

vivzie-pop:

fuckmestupid:

FINALLY SOMEONE FUCKING DID IT

wow. *slow clap* finally one of these I can get behind.

seriously guys, just donate and stop wasting water

it’s effecting the planet.

liz-pls:

Published on Aug 21, 2014

Incredible! Ferguson Committeewoman Patricia Bynes (D), openly convicts Officer Darren Wilson and she’s not even a witness to the shooting.

Look at this. Just look. This is on the news. They tell this poor woman that her view is biased and convicts an “innocent man” when they can’t see that they, themselves, are doing the exact same thing. I just. Why? Why are there people who get paid to do this? It is no longer about news. Its now only about personal opinions.

jessehimself:

I recorded this last night. The volume was mad low because my daughter was sleeping, so that’s my annoying mistake. But the audio is clear, just turn up your volume or use headphones and listen closely to the astonishingly malicious reporting from CNN International (which takes over American CNN every night for some reason).

They have 3 [Black] eyewitnesses, which they completely disregard by framing a false equivalency with— and I’m not making this up, "an anonymous caller who did NOT witness the shooting BUT is a friend of the officers"

Whaaaaaat? You’re rebutting 3 eyewitnesses with  an anonymous caller who did NOT even see the events AND is a friend of the shooter? Really?

Where they do that at?

CNN continues, “"an anonymous caller who did NOT witness the shooting BUT is a friend of the officers says Michael Brown was the aggressor, which CNN has CONFIRMED matches the account officer Wilson gave authorities.”

Oh, you confirmed it did you? Of course it matches, she’s representing the guy who will literally say anything to stay out of jail. She already admitted that she could not possibly know if what she’s saying is true, and CNN broadcasts it around the world. Think about that. They use the word “confirmed” in an attempt to add validity to propoganda, while making it sound like they did some work.  

Then, as if that wasn’t crazy enough, they immediately play the ANONYMOUS person’s call/version of events on TV!! (With captioning to make sure the narrative really burns into your consciousness.) Her version has literally zero merit. They did not play any of the eyewitness accounts and went straight to a play-by-play from someone who WASN’T EVEN THERE??!!

That is a gross violation of journalistic responsibility and public trust.

The question is not “if” but why; why have news networks chosen a side?

(Granted, none of these accounts are given under oath; none are automatically true. But at least ask people who could possibly be of value.)

linaevelovesyou:

kayla-bird:

essayofthoughts:

indigoumbrella:

essayofthoughts:

indigoumbrella:

huffpostarts:

In The Not So Distant Future, Glow-In-The-Dark Trees Could Replace Street Lights

Is that… is that even healthy?

There are sea organisms and fungi which glow in the dark and there’s fireflies and jellyfish which glow in the dark. It doesn’t do them any harm nor does it do the people around them any harm. I would say its pretty healthy, as well as it would mean more photosynthesis happening in cities which mean cleaner air.

I was just curious about how they were doing it and for some reason I didn’t think to click the link. But thanks! It makes more sense now. I was afraid it was some kind of chemical thing.

nah just genetic modification using existing bioluminescent genes. Genetics is really cool, and so is bioluminescence. I mean they’ve already made pigs glow using jellyfish genes and pigs are waaay more complicated than trees iirc. So they’re actually (i think) less likely to muck it up with trees.

In which case

GLOWY

FORESTS

GLOWY

TREES

GLOWY

EVERYTHING

(I like glowy things)

#solarpunk

The only potential problem I could see with this right off the bat is light pollution but honestly it would probably be a lot less harmful than the amount of light pollution that exists because of current streetlights.

BUT SERIOUSLY IMAGINE THIS + SOLAR ROADWAYS?? please can solarpunk be the future because I am /so/ on that train

The problem is that this is about as bullshit as solar roadways. It’s rather fitting that it was brought up, because that’s exactly what came to mind while reading this.

While solar roadways have been thoroughly debunked by intelligent people, who did even a little bit of research, this would most likely be useless because the light these plants could give, would not be nearly enough to be used in place of streetlights. On the other hand, it would in fact cause more light pollution. Perhaps even more than properly designed streetlights would, because plants spread, and while they wouldn’t give enough light as streetlights, since their light would not be strictly directed downwards, their light pollution would be worse.

Using bio-luminescent plants would basically be like using glowsticks. You might find your way to your friend in a dark room, if they are holding a glowstick, but it will certainly not light a path for you. Not even a dozen of them. This is exactly the reason they use similar lights in theaters, because they give just enough light for you to see the dim outline of the stairs on your way out, but they do not light up the room enough to bother the people still in their seats.

So while this is a cool idea, just like solar roadways, it is about as useless, when you stop to think about it.

vivzie-pop:

hoodfuturism:

artemiskaonai:

MAINSTREAM MEDIA WILL SAY THAT THE PROTESTERS STARTED THE VIOLENCE ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT. THIS IS NOT THE CASE AS PROVEN BY THE VIDEO ABOVE.

please watch this before its taken down

oh my actual god. This hasta go viral.

shwagerr:

Omg….

Too soon…

shwagerr:

Omg….

Too soon…

pulpdrinker:

i have never seen something more clearly written by a straight white male

Straight, white male or not, that’s one dumb-ass statement indeed.

pulpdrinker:

i have never seen something more clearly written by a straight white male

Straight, white male or not, that’s one dumb-ass statement indeed.